• Part I, The Office According to The Office
• Part II, Posturetalk, Powertalk, Babytalk and Gametalk
• Part III, The Curse of Development
• Part IV, Wonderful Human Beings
• Part V, Heads I Win, Tails You Lose
• Part VI: Children of an Absent God
• Morality, Compassion and the Sociopath
• The Genealogy of the Gervais Principle

I can't resist my $0.02 worth of input. I'm probably going to regret this. In the very early teens, there were six of us mere engineers in the embedded space at Intel who REALLY tried hard to get Intel management to listen to us about the (for Intel) "crazy new" technology called AI (Artificial Intelligence). Intel management saw AI architecture as competition to their dominant lead with Intel Architecture (IA) and rejected our recommendations. I understand why. Years earlier when Intel acquired StrongARM technology I asked Gelsinger (a General Manager at the time) why we/Intel were not pursuing the benefits of RISC architecture. Intel Embedded could have REALLY used something like RISC in the embedded space. Gelsinger's response was that they (Intel management) had witnessed too many companies going under because they adopted multiple architectures and could not sustain the burden of propping them all up. It was Gelsinger that killed the StrongARM at Intel. Months later my engineering colleagues and I decided to try again, but with a new tactic. We positioned AI as an adjunct/complementary accelerator to IA ... you know, like a GPU. But it was too little too late, Intel management saw us coming and again rejected our technical counsel. I can't help but feel somewhat responsible, for it was my job as a techie to influence and guide the business leaders to do the right thing; and I failed. Nonetheless, I find it ironic that one of those early business management key influencers has since happily retired from Intel and is currently sitting on the Board of Directors at ARM Holdings. Ha! I never had access to senior Intel management, but I did interact with a bunch of Intel middle management. Funny, everyone I talked to had read the words of Peter Drucker and the book "Innovators Dilemma" by Clayton Christensen. All the signs were there ... and at great personal peril, I highlighted them. Yet, the pressures of the moment compelled Intel managers to focus on immediate deliverables and did so at their peril. Not REALLY at their peril, because ALL of them have since retired from Intel and are no longer around to blame. The whole thing breaks my heart as I witness good friends who have devoted their entire careers to Intel being pushed out the door via yet another big layoff. The Intel legacy is OVER ... deal with it (unless they productize their Neuromorphic technology, then watch out).

Я знаю, мы склонны слишком сильно обожествлять генеральных директоров, но битва между Twitter и Threads будет интересной именно потому, что эти два парня (1) движимы одним сильным четким видением будущего (нравится вам это или нет), и (2) такие "кровожадные" в своей решимости доказать свою правоту.

Нам довелось застать их в начале их карьеры на сцене в Музее компьютерной истории, и когда я пересматривал интервью, я был поражен, насколько они звучат так, будто говорили об этих проблемах только на прошлой неделе.

spamsink