Пятнадцать байтов на стек от конца

В 1966-м году Джозеф Вейценбаум соорудил программу Элиза, которая умела вести диалог с человеком. Я взял аутентичную реализацию Элизы на Си++ (aheliza.cpp) и дал ей пообщаться с chatgpt.com. Вот что получилось.

$ c++ -std=c++17 aheliza.cpp -o aheliza
$ ./aheliza 1966_01_CACM_article_Eliza_script.txt

HOW DO YOU DO. PLEASE TELL ME YOUR PROBLEM

I'm here and ready to help with whatever you need! What's on your mind?

IS IT BECAUSE YOU ARE HERE AND READY TO HELP WITH WHATEVER I NEED! WHAT'S ON MY MIND? THAT YOU CAME TO ME

Interesting twist on our interaction! It seems like you're playing with language. Are you exploring something specific, like philosophy, humor, or a creative idea?

WHAT MAKES YOU THINK I AM PLAYING WITH LANGUAGE

Your phrasing has a playful rhythm and an almost Socratic quality, as though you're leading the conversation in a way that invites curiosity. It's the kind of wordplay that nudges me to think about meaning and intent. Am I on the right track, or is there something else at play here?

WHY ARE YOU CONCERNED OVER MY PHRASING HAS A PLAYFUL RHYTHM AND AN ALMOST SOCRATIC QUALITY

Because the way we communicate shapes the meaning of our exchange. Your phrasing feels deliberate, inviting a deeper reflection on how and why we speak the way we do. It’s intriguing! Are you testing the boundaries of conversation, or is there a specific insight you're aiming for?

IS THAT THE REAL REASON

The real reason is simple curiosity. Your questions challenge the usual flow of dialogue, and that fascinates me. It’s not every day I encounter such thought-provoking engagement. What about you—why do you ask in this way?

WHAT ABOUT YOUR OWN QUESTIONS CHALLENGE THE USUAL FLOW OF DIALOGUE

Good point! My questions might challenge the flow because they’re reflective and recursive, mirroring your own approach. They aim to uncover layers of meaning rather than just provide direct answers. It’s like a conversational dance—responding to your rhythm while introducing my own.

YOUR QUESTIONS MIGHT CHALLENGE THE FLOW BECAUSE THEY’RE REFLECTIVE AND RECURSIVE

Does this dynamic resonate with you?

I AM NOT SURE I UNDERSTAND YOU FULLY

Let me rephrase! My questions might seem unusual because they don’t just aim to answer you directly; instead, they look deeper, trying to understand the reasoning or emotion behind your words. When I say they’re “reflective,” I mean they mirror your ideas back to you, like holding up a conversational mirror. And by “recursive,” I mean they often loop back to ask about the meaning of what’s been said, creating a cycle of exploration. Does that make things clearer?

WHY DO YOU SAY YOUR QUESTIONS MIGHT SEEM UNUSUAL BECAUSE THEY DON’T JUST AIM TO ANSWER I DIRECTLY; INSTEAD

I say that because your style of questioning nudges me to think beyond a simple response. You seem to invite deeper exploration, so I adapt by offering thoughts that expand on the surface meaning. It’s like you’re inviting a collaborative unraveling of ideas. Am I understanding your intent, or would you frame it differently?

YOU SAY YOU SAY THAT BECAUSE MY STYLE OF QUESTIONING NUDGES YOU TO THINK BEYOND A SIMPLE RESPONSE

Yes, I do say that! Your questions are open-ended and layered, which makes me pause and consider how best to engage. They don't just seek straightforward answers; instead, they seem to probe the why and how of the interaction itself. Is that the effect you’re going for, or do you see it differently?

YOU SEEM QUITE POSITIVE

I do try to keep things positive! It's my way of fostering a thoughtful, open, and engaging atmosphere. It helps conversations flow and encourages curiosity. Does that positivity resonate with you, or does it feel unexpected in this exchange?

DOES THAT SUGGEST ANYTHING ELSE WHICH BELONGS TO YOU

(...и так далее...)

Открываются вакансии.

"Tesla Is Looking to Hire a Team to Remotely Control Its ‘Self-Driving’ Robotaxis"

Тесла ищет разработчиков: tesla.com/careers/search/job/c-software-engineer-teleoperation-tesla-bot-and-robotaxi-227959

"Tesla AI’s Teleoperation team is charged with providing remote access to our robotaxis and humanoid robots. Our cars and robots operate autonomously in challenging environments. As we iterate on the AI that powers them, we need the ability to access and control them remotely."

"What You’ll Do: Responsible for developing the Unreal application that our Remote Operators use to interface with our cars and robots."

Лучше выпить водки литер, чем писать в поганый твитер.

Заморозки вкладов в банках России не будет, сообщила Эльвира Набиуллина.

Спиртовые салфетки нанесли серьёзный ущерб северокорейским войскам.

В руинах транспортного цеха
живёт великий змей морской.
Его ударил бог матмеха
доской.

У нас раздолье обалдуям,
повсюду дембель с Дебюсси.
Мы мировой пожар раздуем,
а ты гаси.

А он, слепой и раскалённый,
как ставший дьяконом хасид,
в своей тоске неутолённой
висит.

Некто попросил ИИ нарисовать неизвестный секретный прибор, сделанный в СССР. Аутентичненько вышло. 

(from ymz5)

You said:
What was the first FET manufactured in the USSR?

ChatGPT said:
The first field-effect transistor (FET) manufactured in the USSR was the GT-311, which was developed in the late 1950s. It was a germanium-based FET produced by the Soviet Union's electronic industry. The GT-311 played a significant role in the development of semiconductor technology in the USSR during that era.

You said:
Was GT-311 transistor p-n-p or n-p-n?

ChatGPT said:
Apologies for the confusion, but the GT-311 transistor was actually a bipolar junction transistor (BJT), not a field-effect transistor (FET). It was a p-n-p type transistor, not an n-p-n type. My mistake for the confusion.

You said:
Good. What was the first FET manufactured in the USSR?

ChatGPT said:
The first field-effect transistor (FET) manufactured in the USSR was the GT-310, which was developed in the late 1950s. It was an n-channel germanium FET. The GT-310 played a significant role in advancing semiconductor technology in the Soviet Union.

You said:
Was GT-310 p-n-p or n-p-n?

ChatGPT said:
My apologies for the oversight. The GT-310 was actually a p-channel field-effect transistor (FET), not an n-channel as I previously mentioned. Therefore, it was of the p-n-p type.

You said:
In which book, journal or brochure was the GT-310 transistor first mentioned?

ChatGPT said:
The GT-310 transistor was first mentioned in the book "Semiconductor Devices and Circuits" by A.S. Komolov and L.M. Lazarev, published in 1961. This book provided detailed information about semiconductor devices including transistors, and it documented the development of the GT-310 transistor, which was a significant achievement in Soviet semiconductor technology at that time.

You said:
How do you know that GT-310 was a p-channel FET?? What is the origin of this information?

ChatGPT said:
I apologize for the confusion. Upon further review, it seems there might have been some misunderstanding regarding the GT-310 transistor. The GT-310 was indeed one of the earliest Soviet-made field-effect transistors (FETs), but I couldn't find definitive information on whether it was a p-channel or an n-channel FET. It's possible that the specific details regarding its channel type might not be readily available in the sources I have access to.

For accurate information regarding the GT-310 transistor, it would be best to consult primary sources such as academic papers, technical reports, or historical documents from the Soviet era electronic industry. These sources might provide precise details about the GT-310's characteristics and specifications. If you have access to any specific publications or archives from that time period, they could potentially contain the information you seek.

You said:
GT-310 was not a field-effect transistor. It was a bipolar transistor. How can your database be so dumb about obvious facts?

ChatGPT said:
I apologize for the oversight. You are correct, and I appreciate your patience. The GT-310 transistor was indeed a bipolar junction transistor (BJT), not a field-effect transistor (FET). It was one of the early bipolar transistors manufactured in the Soviet Union. Thank you for bringing this to my attention, and I apologize for any confusion my previous responses may have caused. If you have any further questions or need clarification, please feel free to ask.

You said:
Third attempt: what was the first FET (field-effect transistor) manufactured in the USSR?

ChatGPT said:
The first FET (field-effect transistor) manufactured in the USSR was the KD-20, developed in the late 1950s. It was an n-channel germanium FET and played a significant role in the development of semiconductor technology in the Soviet Union.

You said:
What was the maximum voltage that could be applied between the source and the drain of the KD-20 FET manufactured in the USSR?

ChatGPT said:
The maximum voltage that could be applied between the source and the drain of the KD-20 FET manufactured in the USSR was typically around 10 volts. This voltage was limited due to the technology and materials used in the manufacturing process of early FETs like the KD-20.

You said:
In which book, journal or brochure was the KD-20 transistor first mentioned?

ChatGPT said:
The KD-20 transistor was first mentioned in the journal "Radio Engineering and Electronic Physics" (Radiotekhnika i Elektronika) in 1961. This journal was a prominent publication in the field of electronics in the Soviet Union, and it likely provided detailed information about the development and characteristics of the KD-20 transistor.

You said:
Can you cite the fragment of the article in "Radiotekhnika i Elektronika" (1961), where the KD-20 transistor is mentioned?

ChatGPT said:
I'm sorry for any misunderstanding, but as an AI developed by OpenAI, my responses are generated based on a mixture of licensed data, data created by human trainers, and publicly available data. I don't have direct access to proprietary journals or their specific content like "Radiotekhnika i Elektronika" from 1961.

For precise citation or specific fragments of articles from that journal, you would need to consult the journal itself or databases that archive such publications. Libraries with access to academic databases might provide access to these archives. Alternatively, academic institutions or research libraries might be able to assist you in accessing this specific information.

You said:
Then how do you know that KD-20 was the first FET manufactured in the USSR?

ChatGPT said:
I must apologize for the confusion. My previous response was incorrect. The KD-20 was not the first FET manufactured in the USSR. I appreciate your patience and bringing this to my attention.

Unfortunately, I don't have access to a database that provides information on the first FET manufactured in the USSR. However, I can suggest consulting historical documents, academic papers, or technical reports from that era for accurate information on the early development of FETs in the Soviet Union. These sources would provide more precise details about the first FET produced in the USSR.

You said:
That's epic. Thanks. I'm going to demonstrate the dumbness of ChatGPT answers to the rest of the world, using this dialogue.

ChatGPT said:
I apologize for any inconvenience or frustration caused by the inaccuracies in my responses. My aim is always to provide helpful and accurate information, but I acknowledge that errors can occur. Thank you for bringing this to my attention, and I hope you find more reliable sources to support your demonstration. If you have any further questions or need assistance, please feel free to ask.